'Blogging the bright lights of the Big Smoke

'Blogging the bright lights of the Big Smoke

03 May, 2010

I am an idiot

...an online dating blunder par excellence

SOMEBODY please tar and feather me. On the 3rd of April, I sent a message to a lovely young lady on OK Cupid. On the 5th of April, I got an enormously long message from a rather odd seeming person who really didn't seem suitable: I was very busy at the time, and didn't even get to the end of the message. A few days later, I checked my smartphone to see another message from OK Cupid. I looked, and the user-name was one that I recognised, and I concluded that it was Ms Long Rambling Message again, and, being even busier than the last time, didn't respond or even look at the message.

This evening, I was checking through the "quiver matches" with which it sets one up and noticed a little pink icon in the top right-hand corner of the browser window, being the sign for new mail. I remembered what had happened before, but wanted to open the message so that it would re-set the pink icon so that it only appeared if I had actual new mail. I then realised, to my horror, that the second mail was not from Ms Rambling Message at all, but from Ms Lovely of the previous occasion, to whom I had sent a short message, and she had replied in delightfully witty fashion. On the 9th of April. Nearly a month ago. And I haven't sent her any messages since. She must now think that I am a complete idiot, and she may well be right.

Excuse me while I find some tar and feathers...

02 May, 2010

Turning it around

...an old thought turns with the old tune in my head

I SEEM always to be over-motivated or under-motivated about romance: over-motivated when, rarely, somebody interesting, attractive, potentially suitable, available and seemingly possibly interested catches my eye, when I get terribly anxious about whether she is properly interested, or just happened to be feeling playful/frisky/drunk when I caught what I thought were signs of interest, how not to blow it, how to express some level of attraction without being too forward, inappropriate or keen, where best to ask her out, how to go about asking her out, whether she really is suitable after all, why she hasn't replied to the e-mail that I sent her twenty-five minutes ago and how cute that she looks in a hat; and under-motivated the rest of the time, when the thought of staying at home and engaging in my latest hobby of computer programming seems far more enticing than the thought of going out with friends and potentially meeting new people (only to-day, turning down a barbecue in the rain for just such reasons), or finding out more about or making effort to pursue properly somebody who might conceivably be interesting but who don't make my heart beat faster when she walks into the room. Either way, I inevitably blow it.

I suspect that that might be part of the early-filtering mentality: if a person doesn't catch my interest, I simply lack motivation to pursue her; and, because I'm so rubbish at it, it takes a great deal of effort (and therefore motivation) to attempt to do so. As I rack up an impressive score of blowing it, I become less inclined to be enthusiastic, and err on the side of caution and under-motivation; and every time that I feel inclined to be enthusiastic, I remind myself that I'll never get anywhere by being too keen and that it's no use pursuing disappointment, that being constantly anxious is a singularly unpleasant experience, and that I might as well get on with other things and hope for the best. The computer programming has been coming on well recently.


"It means that she sees you as just a friend - unless you can find a way of turning it around somehow".

I had asked Lara about whether there was any significance to the fact that Catelyn had called me of her own initiative and suggested we go for lunch', but had not replied to my e-mail. Dennis enquired as to the background. Lara briefly explained, and concluded,

"...but [CoatMan] f***ed it up"

"What did he do?"

"Ughh - he asked her out and invited a friend along"

"It's not as simple as that", I protested.

"Yes it is! It really is that simple."

Dennis didn't say anything, but smiled.

"You've got to find a way of letting her know you think she's hot," she continued, then put on a silly voice and said, "hey, you're hot, yo!" and then added, "Don't say that", as if she thought that there was a possibility that I might have taken her seriously.

But it really wasn't as simple as that. Last time that I'd asked her out, over two years ago, she'd brought friends along: it turned out that she had a boyfriend at the time. I'd thought of her in those terms since then, and although I'd always been attracted to her, I'd not thought of her as potential, and had consciously avoided doing anything that might suggest an interest other than as a friend, partly to avoid disappointment, and partly so as to avoid being inappropriate: there's nothing worse than somebody who can't take a hint. When, at the conference, she showed what could be interpreted as signs of interest, I was confused, and played it safe. I hadn't had the chance to speak to anyone or get comments here to get confirmation that I hadn't wildly misinterpreted things before I sent her the e-mail suggesting that Dominic come along - a suggestion that I'd made before when she suggested meeting up, when, for all I knew at the time, she was still with her boyfriend.

I was going to e-mail her to confirm what we had planned for this week-end, when I noticed that the diary entry that I had made at the conference had recorded that she had asked me to text her to remind her. I sent her a message on Thursday lunch' time:

"Hello - are we still on for Saturday with cake?"

I hadn't had a reply by Friday evening. It was perhaps a sign of incipient under-motivation that my main concern was my ability to plan my week-end rather than whether I'd get to see Catelyn. I called her shortly after seven.

She apologised for not having replied to my text message; she said that she had planned to reply in the morning, but had been sent to court at short notice, and then again elsewhere in the afternoon. I forget now the exact order of the conversation, but she explained that we'd have to reschedule the cake expedition she had agreed to take on a case lasting all four working days of next week on behalf of a friend, and she'd have to spend the whole week-end preparing. I had half expected, having quite possibly blown it, that things would not go ahead as planned. I looked forward to a week-end of working on the programming but was mildly irritated that I had not organised an internet delivery of groceries on account of having planned to be in Bristol.

I had expected a short, functional conversation, but Catelyn, who is more than usually direct and to the point about most things, engaged me in conversation about all and sundry, asking me how I was and what I had been doing (out of what seemed to be more than politeness, judging in part from the fact that when I replied that I was fine, thank you very much, and how was she, she repeated the question pointedly a short while later), and talking about what she had been doing of late (mostly working, it seems: she mentioned at one point about not having much of a social life). We talked again about what we had discussed on the last occasion of her meeting, how she somewhat regrets having moved to Bristol, that she did not want to be thought of badly for leaving her present place of work relatively shortly after having completed her training, that she gets better work there than she would were she in London, but that she misses her family who live in Surrey, where she grew up, remarking upon a recent occasion where she saw for the first time her recently born nephew and her family remarked on them never seeing her. She asked me what I thought. I had mentioned on several occasions my Samuel Johnsonesque views about London, and said that I can't imagine that she'd have difficulty finding somewhere in London, as she was good and good fully-qualified people are not in abundance, that a desire to move locations would be likely to be seen as a legitimate reason for moving, but that, after she had mentioned a tentative plan to sit it out in Bristol for the rest of the year and then explore options for returning to London, there is something to be said for the view that a person who does not leave too soon after her training has finished is likely to be taken more seriously, and that, although somewhat arbitrary, a year is as good a measure as any.

We then talked about when to reschedule to. She suggested Friday evening, which I couldn't do because we have our work party that evening, which is not merely an office jolly, but an important marketing event that everyone is expected to attend. We settled on the Saturday; she would be staying with her parents for the duration of the case in London, and she was staying over to Saturday; she suggested that we have lunch' at a rather famous restaurant (reputedly the oldest in London) to which she had never been, but had wanted to go; I mentioned that I'd been some years previously at a work Christmas party and that it was indeed rather good. She said that she'd call me in the week, and that, if she hadn't called by Wednesday, it was because she was busy, and that I should call her. She also mentioned that it was the sort of place where we'd have to book.

She mentioned that she'd have to get off for dinner, but, somehow, the conversation carried on for another good ten minutes; she mentioned that her friend, whom she had mentioned before at the conference, was to move in with her next week (she had agreed to let her lodge in her flat in Bristol whilst she undertook some training for about six months), and had remarked then, and remarked again on Friday, that she anticipates that she will "drive [her] mad", and added,

"You're definitely coming to stay when she's moved in!"

having previously mentioned that we would have to do the baking thing postponed from this week-end some time soon.

After our conversation, which had lasted at least half an hour, had finished, I entered our booked rendezvous into my diary, and noticed then that I had already booked to see a friend and his wife in an amateur musical in Woking that evening. I e-mailed Catelyn from my smartphone,

"[Cat],

have just noticed in my diary that I've arranged to see some friends who are in a play in Woking on Saturday evening. Doesn't necessarily interfere with lunch', but would you like to come along (if I can get another ticket)? It's an amateur thing, but should be fun. I thought it might be convenient for you if you are staying with your parents.

Do let me know what you think,

[CoatMan]

She had also asked my advice about a case on which she was working, and, shortly afterwards, another thought in that connexion came to me, so I sent her a short text asking whether a particular type of claim was being brought. A minute or two later she responded that it wasn't, to which I responded "pity".

She hasn't replied to the e-mail, but she called me early yesterday afternoon to ask my advice about the four-day case; it was in an area with which I was unfamiliar (as, I am fairly sure, she knew), so could only give an equivocal answer. That conversation was of rather more swift dispatch than the one of the previous evening.


Near where I live, there is a lovely little "vintage shop", selling all sorts of delightful trinkets and items of furniture from ages past: I have bought many a wonderful thing from there, ranging from a 1950s bathroom mirror to a 1920s tea-set. This afternoon, when waiting for my towels to finish drying in the local launderette, I wandered down to the shop to browse. The friendly owners, who recognised me from previous occasions, politely said hello but didn't try to persuade me to buy anything. That is rather how shopkeepers should be, I think.

After I had spent a few minutes browsing, a younger woman, holding a giant yellow plastic dragonfly on a stick, asked me,

"What are you buying?"

Almost instinctively, I responded,

"Just browsing to-day, thank you."

It took me a while to work out that she didn't actually work there herself, as she seemed more keen on trying to sell me things than the actual shopkeepers:

"You've got to buy something!"

"Ahh, no, I'm fine. Just browsing to-day."

"Look at what I got!"

She moved the giant yellow plastic dragonfly up and down on its metal stick and its wings flapped obediently.

"It reminds me of happy times", she continued, seemingly unaware that one didn't normally go into such detail with strangers.

I smiled and nodded politely. "Ahh, that's good!"

"It reminds me of when I went to live in Japan. They had lots of these there."

"Plastic dragonflies on sticks?"

She ignored my attempt at humour and continued. "They're surprisingly gentle: they'd come and sit on your hand if you sat still. They called them Tombos"

"The dragon flies?"

"Yes. Once, when I couldn't have a conversation with somebody - he didn't speak any English and I didn't speak any Japanese - we spent a whole afternoon in a garden with them just saying 'Tombo, Tombo, Tombo!'". She flapped her arms for effect.

"Ah." I smiled and nodded, and wondered whether it was nearly the shop's closing time.

Her friends, who had been browsing elsewhere, said that it was time to be going, and they practically danced out of the shop, singing, "Follow the yellow Tombo!" to the tune of "Follow the Yellow Brick Road". It seems that my under-enthusiasm for talking to strangers may not be entirely universal.


I should probably look into that restaurant and check how long in advance that one needs to book for a Saturday lunch' time, but I half expect to be rescheduled again; I had originally wondered whether I should plan some activities for Catelyn and I to do in Bristol, thinking that she might be somewhat impressed if I had planned things for when she had invited me, but under-enthusiasm rather took over and I spent the time ironing out bugs in the computer program instead. Being driven by the nagging belief that one ought to do something lest a chance of something good slips away is rather less effective than being motivated by genuine enthusiasm.

I did have some enthusiasm for Catelyn at one point, both when I first knew her, and recently, after the conference, and after some of the people on this 'blog helped to decipher her behaviour there. I was sent to Blackpool for work recently, not too long after I'd sent her the e-mail, when I still thought she might reply to it. (I referred to my trip to Blackpool in my conversation with her on the telephone on Friday, and she seemed to respond with more laughter than I thought merited when I responded, to her saying that it was sweet that I'd bought rock for everyone in work, "pun intended?") I remember strolling along the promenade in unseasonably beautiful April sunshine on the evening that I arrived, looking forward to taking photographs of the sunset on the pier (much as I had done in Brighton last year, shortly after I had first become interested in Lara, and had rather less restrained, but ultimately misplaced, feelings of enthusiasm), and looking forward to seeing Catelyn. As the evening wore on, however, and the sun went down, a chill Lancashire wind descended on the still slightly out of season coastal resort, and I realised that the sun set in the wrong direction to get any good pictures. It then became apparent that there is very little to get anything other than fish and chips to eat in Blackpool late of an evening, and I spent a long time hunting for a restaurant in the bitter cold before finding a little Hong Kong style place that, from what I could tell, cooked all of its food from cartons in a microwave, and where the only pudding worth ordering was a scoop of supermarket ice-cream in a little metal dish.

The question is: is there anything that justifies my enthusiasm being turned around, or are my chances of un-blowing it with Catelyn equivalent to finding a Michelin star in Blackpool?

13 April, 2010

The joys of spring

...daffodil season

Daffodils

SHE CALLED me. I had been sent this afternoon for quite an easy case in a court in a little town in Sussex. Had a lovely snooze on the train on the way there. Strolled from the station, stopping to collect some lunch' on the way. The sun was shining, and the pleasant little town to which I had been sent had daffodils in bloom on all the little traffic islands.

Just as I crossed the quiet little road, whose banks were lined with flowers, outside the court, at about ten past one this afternoon, my mobile telephone rang. I retrieved my telephone from my pocket straight away, while standing on a traffic island, expecting the call to be related to the case that I had been sent to do, and was somewhat surprised to see Catelyn's name, especially since she hadn't responded to the e-mail that I had sent her the previous week.

"Hello! How are you?" I answered.

"Fine; are you in London?"

"No, I'm in [Sussex Town]."

"I'm [inaudible]"

"What was that, sorry?" The traffic in the nearby main road made it hard to hear clearly. After not hearing her for a second time, I put her on speakerphone so that I could hear her properly.

"I'm in [big London court]."

"Ahh, I'm in [Sussex town]."

"If you were in London, I thought we could meet up for lunch'"

"Ahh, rats." I paused for a moment and thought whether there was a practical way of meeting all the same, and quickly realised that there wasn't. "Pity. We'll have to arrange another time to meet up."

"Yes, definitely!"

We wished each other a pleasant afternoon, and I went about my way. Won the case and enjoyed the daffodils on the way back, too. And managed a passable waltz in the dance class this evening.

So, is this a friend zone thing, this last minute luncheon invitation; or a sign of interest; or too ambiguous to call?

06 April, 2010

Trying not to blow it

...avoiding déjà vu

ASK HER out; don't seem too keen; don't fall into the "friend zone"; don't be too formal; end up at a wine bar; and a myriad other easy to state but sometimes hard to follow pieces of advice from friends and 'blog readers alike so accumulate. I e-mailed her this evening:

"[Catelyn],

pity that we weren't able to meet up last week - I was rather looking forward to it. There are worse places to spend the day than Salisbury, however. We should definitely meet up soon - are you free one Saturday afternoon in the next few weeks? I shall take great pleasure in reminding you of the many reasons to miss London!

Was indeed lovely to see you at [the conference]; see you soon, hopefully,

[CoatMan]."

Will she reply? Has CoatMan blown it already? Will he ever ride off into the sunset? Who will win the 2010 General Election? And just how cold is Blackpool in April? Stay tuned for the next thrilling instalment...

31 March, 2010

Plan B

...Rain and silver linings

TO-DAY was a day of things going slightly, but not seriously, wrong. Was sent to court in the North of England and narrowly lost the case. Got lost in the way because I put the wrong postcode into my GPS-equipped pocket computer, but managed to get to court without being late (but didn't have time for lunch'). It rained and my umbrella broke, but managed to get it to cover enough of me that I didn't get too wet. Got back so late that I missed my dancing class, but managed to make two large crumbles to freeze, although didn't also make the brownies that I had hoped to make.

Catelyn sent me the following e-mail:

"Unfortunately my case tomorrow has settled so I'm now in [distant city] all day instead. Will have to organise to meet up another time.

Was lovely to see you this weekend.

Best,

[Caty] x

Sent from my iPhone"

By coincidence, had a plan B for the evening: a friend's birthday dinner, so, either way, my frozen crumble reserves will remain undepleted for the day. As to Catelyn - evidently not a mere excuse, as such occurrences are commonplace. An opportunity, perhaps, to ask her out without company - to take her to some of the things that she said that she so missed about London: the wine bars and restaurants and the like. Lara had suggested yesterday that I asked her when she could come up to see me - not simply when she was next in the area, but ask that she make a trip especially to see me. In these changed circumstances, does that advice make sense? Is this a happy coincidence in which Plan B is better than Plan A?

29 March, 2010

The Mayor of the Zone

...and other ironies

IT DIDN'T work out in the end with Kate (see previous posts). I blew it by the very prevarication discussed in the previous post. Second date: I took her to a concert; had a lovely time. At the end, as we parted on the steps of Waterloo station, she went to kiss me and I fudged it. Thought that she was just going for a kiss on the cheek, and did likewise. There was a third date, but she did the fade after that and we are no longer in touch. There was also someone else whom I saw a couple of times at around that time, but that didn't work out, either. I did, however, get two very pleasant dates out of it, and got to borrow her Nigella Lawson recipe book, the brownies that I made from the recipe therein being most popular amongst my friends.

Fast forward to last week-end. I attended a residential conference in an old university town, staying overnight Friday and Saturday. As always, there is a dinner on the Friday evening for those who choose to come on the Friday, and a "gala dinner" and disco on the Saturday. I woke early on the Saturday, and after breakfast and before the conference started, I browsed the large ring binder of papers given to us by the conference organisers. Scanning the delegate list for anyone I knew, I came upon the name of Catelyn.

Catelyn, about whom I have 'blogged several years ago, was someone whom I knew through a voluntary organisation for which we used to work. We used to exchange banter in the offices about three years ago, but she was with somebody else at the time. She had gone off to work in Brussels for six months, and, when she came back, suspecting that she might have become available (and thinking that there wasn't much to lose), I'd asked her out, taking her to a tiny underground jazz bar that used to be a gentleman's lavatory. She had obviously not considered it a date: she brought along several of her friends, and it transpired during the evening that she was indeed still with the same boyfriend. It didn't matter a great deal - we all had a rather good night out, and I'd always considered asking her out somewhat of a punt.

I next saw her at a fund-raising dinner organised by the same charity for whom we used to work, wearing a striking bright blue dress. Although she was still with the same boyfriend at the time, another fellow - I'll call him Tim - was obviously flirting with her, using what looked suspiciously like PUA techniques. Not having any interest in the mug's game that is flirting with the already taken, I left him to it. She later told me when she bumped into me in a library early last year that she was moving to Bristol, and it emerged during the conversation that she was seeing Tim.

I didn't hear much from her until January this year, when, out of the blue, she sent me a text message asking me if I'd like to come down to Bristol for the week-end for her birthday. I'd already arranged with a group of friends to go to a fancy dress party that week-end, so I declined, and didn't think much of it, assuming her still to be with Tim. She replied that she was often in London, and that she'd let me know when she was up and we could go for a drink and catch up. I'd replied that that was an excellent idea, and we should dig up Dominic, an old mutual friend from the charity, and all meet up. She didn't reply further, and, again, I thought not much of it.

I said hello to her when I saw her at the conference, just before the first talk of the Saturday was due to begin. After a brief exchange of pleasantries, she said something like, "We'll go for drinks later", as the talk was about to start. She sat just behind me. We caught up during the breaks between the talks. She seemed enthusiastic to talk to me, and I got the impression of a degree of flirtatiousness: she touched my arm several times when we talked, which I don't remember her having done before. But I discounted it when another chap, I'll call him Jimmy, appeared to be involved with her. I wasn't sure exactly when the switch had occurred, but it was somewhat immaterial if she was spoken for.

The conference delegates took lunch' together, and Catelyn sat next to me and Jimmy opposite Catelyn, another friend of Jimmy's sitting next to him and therefore opposite me. During the whole lunch', pudding included, she spoke more or less exclusively to me; we spoke at some length about what we had been doing since we'd last seen each other, and talked so much that we were nearly late for the afternoon session.

We did indeed all go for drinks (the same group as at lunch') in the gap between the last session of the afternoon and the "gala dinner". We went to a local pub'; on the way, I talked to Jimmy, who seemed to be a thoroughly nice chap, and Catelyn, who told me how she was successful in her work in Bristol, but that she had no connexions there, and but simultaneously missed London, its attractions and its bars. I mentioned the occasion two years previously when we'd all gone to the little underground bar, and she said something like, "Yes - just like that one!". I'd told her about how I'd moved into a flat in London.

I can't now remember exactly how it arose - except that it was instigated by her - but at one point in the pub', she invited me to come to see her in Bristol for the week-end. I can't remember exactly why now, but we alighted on the bank holiday week-end at the beginning of May; as I was staying with my parents for the Easter bank holiday week-end. It also came up that she was in court in the London area on Wednesday, and, pursuant to what she had suggested back in January in that regard, she suggested meeting up (it might have been me who suggested it - I forget for sure, but I think that it was her). Not thinking anything of it other than a chance to catch up with an old (if rather attractive) friend, I again suggested that we get in touch with the old mutual friend (who was one of the friends whom she had brought when I had previously tried to ask her out), to which she replied that she'd somewhat lost touch with him. I'd asked whether she had his number, and she said that she did (I didn't have his number), but she seemed rather non-committal about contacting him.

For some reason unfathomable to the sane, and despite my explanation of just how good that the pudding had been the previous evening, all three of them decided that they were going to miss the "gala" dinner and stay in the pub'. Not being one to miss out on food that I'd already paid for (especially when pudding is involved), I left them to it and hurried back to the dining hall, where lamb awaited the eager diners. I took a picture of our pudding with my camera phone and sent it to her by MMS, asking whether she was regretting not having dinner.

Dinner was followed by a stand-up act, which, although funny, lasted quite a long time. During the dinner, Catelyn had sent me two text messages and tried to call me, but I had my telephone on silent, so wasn't able to respond. She, Jimmy and the other fellow were sitting in the bar afterwards; she had changed into a striking bright red dress with rather sexy high-heeled shiny shoes, and Jimmy had put on a tie. I sat next to Catelyn and we talked some more. She asked me at one point whether I liked her shoes (I did). Again, she touched my arm when she spoke to me.

Up to this point, I had proceeded on the basis that she was seeing Jimmy, that any flirtation was the sort of idle, playful flirtation that doesn't mean a great deal, and that our meetings had been arranged as one would for old friends to catch up. I did not even think much of it when she had retorted, when I had quipped that I expect that the next time that I would see her, she would be wearing a bright green dress (referring to the red dress that she was currently wearing and the blue dress that she wore on at the charity dinner two years previously, and the primary colour connexion between the two), that, no, the next time that I'd see her, we'd be baking cakes (I'd explained earlier my penchant for baking) in her flat.

However, when Jimmy went to buy a round of drinks, Catelyn leaned in closely to me and gave me the following account: she had broken up with Tim in December last because he had treated her badly, and had done for some time. She had moved to Bristol in order to be near his family, and she now somewhat regretted having done so, not knowing anyone in Bristol, although, by dint of administrative accident, her career was more successful and financially rewarding in Bristol than it would have been had she been in London. In late January, she had told Jimmy that she liked him; he had replied at the time that he was not interested. She had thought not much of it, and had treated him as a friend thereafter, and they had become good friends. However, somewhat inexplicably, he had told her recently that, actually, he did like her; but, by this time, she had come to think of him as a friend, and had felt most uncomfortable at his advances. After I had left them in the pub', they had had a big argument, in which she had told him - in no uncertain terms - that they were not going out. Later on in the conversation, on what pretext I now forget, I asked her, semi-humorously, whether Tim baked cakes. "Did he f***!", she replied.

A short while later, she asked me to dance, and lead me by the hand onto the dance floor. Although I have been taking ballroom lessons lately, they were not of the greatest use in a disco; I attempted to jive, but that was not terribly successful. I did make an effort to dance, however. After a few minutes had passed, she repeated some of what she had told me before, and expanded on it. She said that, when I had gone for dinner, leaving the three of them in the 'pub, she had thought, "no, don't go!", as Jimmy had been touching her arm (and she physically demonstrated on me how), which had made her feel uncomfortable. She had said how Jimmy had tried to kiss her when they had first met up at the conference, and had even suggested booking a double room, which she did not particularly appreciate. She said that she felt really bad, because he was a "really nice guy", but she felt uncomfortable at his advances. I briefly explained the "friend zone" thing (surprisingly, she had not seen the Friends episode from which the clip at the top of this post is taken; I said that I'd send it to her). I asked her whether she was attracted to him; she said that she had been in January, but not any longer. She said that perhaps he was a bit too much of a nice guy, and said that he had told her that he had told her that he was not interested in January because he did not want to mess up their existing friendship. I had asked her what was wrong with the original fellow that she'd had before Tim; she said that he was good chap, but that she had first started seeing him when she was 19, and that he was somewhat older. She said that he'd now got a new girlfriend himself. I pointed out that Jimmy was rather the opposite of Tim, and that perhaps what she needed was some cross between the two. She seemed to agree, but then said that she was not getting any younger at 28. I said that that was not old, pointing out that I was 29, and she replied (perhaps missing the point that I had intended to make) that that was just one year.

After a short while, we went to rejoin the main group at the bar, and we talked intermittently afterwards. "See you on Wednesday", I said as we parted; "Yes", she replied. She had already planned to have Sunday lunch' with her family and miss the early part of the next day's conference, so I have not seen her since. Since we had not finalised arrangements for Wednesday, I sent her the following e-mail on Sunday evening,

"[Catelyn],

lovely to see you yesterday. Here's the clip that I referred to yesterday, which you might find of amusement/relevance. Apropos Wednesday - is your case morning, afternoon or all day? And do you want to prod [Dominic], or shall I? I don't have his number, but I can Facebook message him. Hope that you got back this afternoon without bother; see you Wednesday,

[CoatMan]."

I have yet to receive a reply.

Last summer, I 'blogged about Lara - somebody who had joined where I worked in June, and had initially shown some interest, but had then apparently lost interest (due, commenters on this 'blog told me, to something akin to the "friend zone" phenomenon described by Catelyn). We have ended up being quite good friends, and she seems to take somewhat of an interest in my dating endeavours after she overheard me replying to Senior Colleague about such things, when I had told her the story of Kate. Indeed, it was to her fancy dress party that I had been going when Catelyn had asked me in January to come and visit her in Bristol. By coincidence, she asked me whether I had had any "dating developments", as I think she put it, this afternoon, which I took as an opportunity to gain some advice on the present situation.

After outlining the story above, she said that it seemed rather ambiguous to her, although that the arm-touching was good; however, that I'd "f***ed it up" by referring to the mutual friend in the e-mail. Rats. She advised not to mention him again, to see how things went on Wednesday, and then ask her down to London again another time - without pretext - and see how she reacts. She said not to talk about Catelyn's "love life", as she put it, as that was a very "friend" thing to do.

This evening, I forwarded her a copy of the e-mail for comments. She replied,

"Ah [CoatMan]! That's a very friendly email! How ironic! You'll just have to try and switch it around on Wednesday. You need to ask her out without there being another reason (I.e. She's not already in the area) and see how she responds.

If you haven't got a response by tomorrow evening, i'd send her a quick text to ask if she's still free.

X"

Given that even Lara, whom I get the impression is rather knowledgeable and experienced in such things, considers the situation to be ambiguous, I'd appreciate people's thoughts. Piecing things together, a few thoughts come to mind. Firstly, although I have now lost the text message records, having upgraded my telephone, I remembered that the date of Lara's party was the 16th of January. Catelyn had told me that she had told Jimmy that she liked him in "late January", and she had texted me a good few days - perhaps even a week - in advance of the time for which she was inviting me. That suggests that she had texted me between the time that she finished things with Tim and the time that she first took an interest in Jimmy, which might well be significant.

Secondly, the significance of her telling me in terms (and some detail) about the situation with Jimmy is pointedly ambiguous. On the one hand, asking for relationship advice is a very "friend" thing to do, and I was the only one whom she knew reasonably well - other than Jimmy - in the bar that evening. On the other, it must have been apparent to her that it would have appeared to everyone that she and Jimmy were together. She must have realised that that is how it would seem to me, and that I would not have done anything if I had that impression (I think that I'd already commented in passing that he seemed to be a nice chap). Was she seeking advice from a friend - just as I was with Lara - or was she making it clear to me that she was available? Was it significant that they had had the "big argument" in the pub' after I had left, and after I had mentioned bringing Dominic along when we met up in London?

Thirdly, although Catelyn is very attractive, both in appearance (when Lara made me dig up Facebook photographs of her, she said, "she's very pretty - well done!") and personality (very bright, intelligent, rational, independently-minded, well spoken and witty), she does live quite some distance away in Bristol, although she spoke when we talked on Saturday about a desire to have a house in Bristol and a flat in London.

Finally, have I totally "f***ed it up", as Lara so eloquently put it, or are things remediable? Answers on a postcard...

09 January, 2010

Trying not to think about elephants

...Coatman's trip to theatreland

"TRY NOT to think about elephants, and all you can think of is elephants. Two million dollars. Two million dollars!".

We saw Six Degrees of Separation at the Old Vic, a play about a wealthy (and somewhat superficial) middle-aged couple taken in by a flamboyant but curious confidence trickster who causes intrigue even after his lie is exposed. Frequently witty, sometimes hilarious, and undoubtedly touching, I should recommend it to anyone who has not seen it. We went on the opening night, the first production of preview week, and it was sold out.

I had briefly wondered whether planning an expedition to the theatre for somebody who works in the theatre was wise, whether Kate would appreciate my choice. I had not told Kate of our intended destination in advance. I had simply told her to meet me at seven-fifteen outside the main street entrance of Waterloo station. She had replied:

"This is pretty exciting, can't remember the last time somebody properly surprised me!

...

p.s. will you wear a hat for me?"

My last winter hat I had lost years ago when, on attending a jurisprudence discussion group at Trinity College, Oxford, I had left it by mistake in the lavatories, and, on my return, it was nowhere to be seen. The lost property department never had sight of it, so I can only assume that either the cleaners or a pilfering student had made off with it, to do what with, I know not. Perhaps there is a thriving black market in used black hats. Perhaps men on street corners the nation over are accosting strangers, with a furtive look in their eyes, and producing trilby hats form beneath their long raincoats, enquiring whether the strangers would want to buy one on the cheap. In any event, I had not replaced it because, frequently riding a bicycle, there was little opportunity to wear it.

I had gone into work yesterday to collect my papers for Monday and catch up on things that had lain undone whilst I was on festive leave. My case on Monday, I discovered, was in the same town in which Kate worked; I should have to walk past her place of work to get to the court from the station. At lunch' time, I took a brief trip to the shops, collecting a get well card for a colleague who has been suffering from pneumonia, and venturing into the only shop of which I could think near where I work that sells trilby hats. They had one black trilby left, on the sale, and, by chance, it was my size. Wearing it walking back to work, I was pleased at how much warmer that it kept me. Kate had sent me a text message earlier stating that, because of the snow, her last train would be at five to eleven in the evening.

I left work early, having been asked to deliver the get well card by hand, my colleague by coincidence living a short walk from the place where I had arranged to meet Kate. I realised when I was part of the way there that I had not ever walked that route to her house before, and that I did not know how long that it would take. Concerned not to be late, I walked more quickly, eventually finding familiar streets, and dropped the card through the door, before quickly turning to walk back to the appointed meeting place. I found a short-cut, and was pleased to note when I looked at my watch that there was plenty of time to spare.

As I walked along the back street towards the station, my telephone told me that I had a text message. In the chill night breeze, I stopped and took off my gloves to check the telephone. Was Kate telling me that the snow had cancelled all of her trains, or that she was going to be late? The message was from my colleague, thanking me for delivering the card. I did, however, send a message to Kate to clarify the location of our meeting, having realised earlier that my description could equally apply to at least two entrances to the sprawling terminus. She replied shortly indicating that she was already there - about ten minutes early. I hurried along.

Outside the station, people braced against the cold and hurried into and out of the entrance, a few lingering by the doors to smoke cigarettes or sell The Big Issue, even the tobacco smoke seeming too chilled to move away from the warmth, loitering lethargically by the doors. I glanced around for somebody appearing to recognise me, or matching the photographs that I had seen on her profile. Nobody was apparent; I kept wondering whether I had mistaken one of the people at whom I had glanced and concluded that it was not her, and that it actually was her, and that I'd seem terribly rude for having glanced away so soon. I walked up and down for a few minutes, and, seeing nobody, sent her a text message asking exactly where she was, and then another saying,

"Look out for the trilby".

A short while later, a tall woman with dark hair, wearing a long coat and a brown trilby emerged from the entrance. We glanced at each other and smiled hesitently.

"Are you...?"

"Are you...?"

we said. We evidently were.

"I thought I was here, but actually I wasn't," she explained, saying that she had gone to another entrance entirely. "Look out for the trilby! I like that."

Kate was tall and fairly slim, quite pretty with just above shoulder length dark hair, dyed a sort of dark chestnut colour. She wore a brown fabric trilby (from Accessorise, she later told me), a long patterned woollen coat, a cream cardigan, a long skirt with brown boots, a purple scarf and purple/brown leather gloves. She gave the appearance of having a kind and relaxed temperament.

In as much as was feasible given the cold, we talked as we walked the short distance to the Old Vic. It was only when we joined the queue that I told her that we had arrived.

"You have good taste!" she said when she knew what we were seeing.

I smiled and told her that it seemed interesting from the description of the website, but that there hadn't been any reviews yet, as this was the opening night.

"Ahh, yes, of course. The eighth - preview week", she said, evidently being aware already of the dates for which this particular production was set to run.

We got inside, into the warm and I realised that we were in the wrong queue, the queue for collecting the tickets: I had collected the tickets on the way into work that morning. We made our way over to the entrance to the stalls.

"You're very organised!" she said.

Once inside and seated, we discussed the theatre and the architecture, and how it compared to the more modern theatre at which she works. Kate noticed what appeared to be a work of art rotating at the top of the set, appearing to have a different abstract picture on each side, and we mused as to what it might be. Kate said that I had got us good seats (in the stalls), and that she was surprised that I had managed to get seats at all (although I rather suspect that the snow helped).

The music started playing, the lights dimmed, and we sat back and watched the play. After a short while, it became apparent that the rotating, two-sided artwork was a replica of a real famous painting that was actually two-sided, the protagonists being wealthy art dealers. We glanced at each other and smiled.

Surprisingly, there was no interval, although the play was good enough that there was no sense of it taking too long without a break. There was hearty applause at the curtain call.

"Shall we have something to eat?" I suggested. Kate agreed.

I had already garnered opinions as to suitable local restaurants on Facebook, cross-referenced them using Top Table, narrowed the possibilities to two, the foremost of which was an intriguing seeming Indian restaurant (she had noted on her profile that she liked Indian and Italian food), and printed out maps of the area for each one, showing the restaurants highlighted with arrows.

We wandered outside, still talking about the play; I had to pause to tie my shoelaces, and we joked that somebody needed to invent some sort of shoelace that did not come loose - "Staylaces" I called them. I looked at my map, and turned left.

"You planned this, didn't you?" She sounded impressed.

We should have turned right. About two hundred meters down the road, and approaching nothing appearing remotely similar to the restaurant in question, I asked two fellows standing smoking cigarettes outside a fish and chip shop whether they knew where the restaurant was. They said that they didn't know, but that it was probably in the opposite direction to that in which we had come. We went a little further just to check, but then, when the launderettes, off-licences and kebab shops gave way to low-rise flats, we turned back, past the fish and chip shop, and passed the theatre, into a place looking far more promising for restaurants. After a short while, I spotted it up ahead, and we went in.

We had to wait a few minutes to be seated, as the restaurant was busy, but it was warm inside, and the conversation flowed well. I wondered whether I should activate my backup restaurant plan, but Kate noticed that the queue was diminishing quickly.

"Do you like curry?" she said, as we entered.

I said that I did, and had noted that she had said on her profile that she liked Indian and Italian, and asked her whether she liked curry.

"Yes, I love curry!".

We were seated, and continued to talk. Kate ordered some sort of roast or fried duck affair in a crepe, and I had curried prawns. She explained that she had only ordered a small ("regular") portion because she had already had a duck wrap on her way, and that she normally eats heartily, joking that ducks had better watch out for her to-night. That was certainly encouraging. In fact, it transpired that her "regular" portion was rather large in itself, almost all of which she ate; we then had a kulfi ice-cream each. That was also encouraging. I do despair at the nibble on a lettuce leaf and skip dessert type; thin is enormously over-rated, I think.

The conversation flowed freely; we quite evidently got on rather well. She seemed relaxed and easygoing; the evening felt more like a good night out than a job interview. We talked about her allotment (and surplus of green beans and courgettes), my cake recipes, her hobby of potholing (and the episode of Father Ted where the guest star Graham Norton's character ends up trapped in the "really dark caves" and drives everybody mad), how we could make a fortune from Staylaces and selling Christmas crackers to the Dutch, her job, where we grew up, and all manner of other miscellany the details of which do not immediately come to mind. She struck me as a kind and genuine person, and was sometimes even almost too keen to reassure me when I apologised for minor problems, such as the turning left instead of right, or the queue in the restaurant.

When we finished the meal, the waiter brought us the bill (which was surprisingly little for two cooked main courses, with side orders, and two puddings), which I immediately grabbed.

"Now, I can tell you're not going to let me pay for the theatre tickets..."

She had mentioned it briefly earlier, and I had made my views clear then.

"No," I replied with a slightly playful conviction.

"So you should let me get dinner."

I smiled and shook my head, and looked around to find the waiter to tell him that I was ready to pay.

"I'm not going to be very happy", she said, in a good-natured way.

"I'll take that risk," I replied with a smile, as the waiter took my debit card from me and put it in the chip and PIN machine.

I forget her exact words, but she said something about having to do something in return.

"You could bake me a cake", I said.

And, so we resolved that she would bake me a cake.

We sat talking for a while after that, until the restaurant had nearly closed and there were few other patrons there. It was long past the time that Kate had earlier given as her last train, although she had told me before we went into the theatre that the railway company had revised their last train time to something past nine, which she knew that she wouldn't make anyway, and that she would work out how to deal with that when the time arose.

I suggested that we go for a walk along the South Bank, and Kate agreed. We walked out of the restaurant (I nearly forgot my hat, and had to go back for it), and talked about winter clothing, Kate expressing a preference for autumn clothing, and me complimenting Kate on her co-ordination. She seemed to be most amused that we were talking about "style", as she put it.

We strolled on to the South Bank, which was nearly deserted - very unusual, Kate remarked, for a Friday night, and pity the poor theatres suffering greatly diminished attendances in the snow. The South Bank is always beautiful at night, and the crispness of the freezing temperatures, combined with the eerie calm gave it a certain je ne sais quoi as we strolled beneath the trees adorned with blue and white lights next to the sprawling river.

"Look! People!" Kate remarked at a small group of thoroughly sober looking young men walking semi-purposefully in the opposite direction.

"Yes - three of them! We can hardly move with the bustle!"

Kate laughed. Those were the only other people that we saw by the river that night.

As we reached the Oxo tower, Kate was evidently thinking about how to get home. I asked her whether she wanted to go on or turn back, and she said that, actually, her night 'bus went from a 'bus stop considerably further in the direction that we were already going. I suggested that we walk to the next bridge and see whether her 'bus stopped at the 'bus stop near there, and she agreed.

We stopped at one point, and I pointed accross the river, showing her the Inns of Court, now dark and hidden behind tall trees. She told me that she had been on a heritage tour of the Inns and surrounding area a few years ago, and had been into Temple Church, which had been very interesting, although somewhat dominated by tourists' rather excessive interest in "The Da Vinci Code", which, she said, she had not read at the time. I was somewhat relieved when, on telling her that I had not read it, she said not to bother. I rather like somebody who dislikes the superficial and trendy and who thinks independently.

She confessed that she had rather discounted people on Match.com who had put "The Da Vinci Code" as their favourite book (of which, she said, there were an awful lot). I said that there were a great many opportunities for humour on Match.com, to which she said that she had liked the quirky sense of humour on my profile. I said that I had meant unintentional humour, and we laughed about the excessive tendency of people (both men and women, it seems, from having conferred on the point) to state that they like going out and staying in, and sitting on the sofa, watching a DVD whilst drinking a glass of wine.

We got to the 'bus stop, and found that Kate's 'bus didn't run from there. We studied the map for a few minutes, then Kate called the transport helpline on her mobile telephone, who told her that she could catch a 'bus one bridge further along. It was, by now, long past midnight. I resolved to walk her to her stop, from where I hoped that I, too, could get a 'bus home. Kate said that that was "very gentlemanly". I pointed out that I probably wouldn't have done it if it was four o'clock in the afternoon, but it was the middle of the night, and it was only reasonable.

Happily, on arrival at the 'bus stop, we found that night 'buses going to destinations good for both of us ran from there. We waited and continued to talk. Before long my 'bus arrived. I thought afterwards that I probably ought to have waited to see Kate onto her 'bus, but when one is tired, one tends not to react so quickly; in any event, the 'bus stop was in a well lit and well-trafficked area, there were a number of people around, and the 'buses seemed frequent.

As we went to part, there was a certain moment of awkwardness, a certain worry that I suspect was shared that, whatever we were doing, we ought be doing something else. We eventually alighted upon a kiss on the cheek, which seemed fitting; Kate certainly seemed happy enough. Just as she was waving me good-bye as I boarded the 'bus, Kate reminded me of her promise to bake the cake. After I had sat down and the 'bus began to move, I waved at Kate sitting under the 'bus shelter. She waved enthusiastically back.

As I travelled home, I sent her a text message thanking her for a lovely "outing of the Trilby Club", and saying that I was looking forward to the cake; I also asked her for her proper e-mail address (realising that I did not have it), and asked her whether she had managed to get the 'bus yet. She replied:

"It was a lovely eve, thanks [Coatman]. My e-mail is [her e-mail] but i'm really bad at answering so phone is best! I'll have to get the cook books out now.. K x"

Later, she sent another text, which I did not receive before turning off my telephone and going to bed:

"Yes i got the bus ok and its snowing in [her town]! How's [my locale]? K x"

I replied this afternoon, explaining that I had not got the message earlier, that my area was fine but snowy and that I was glad that she had caught the 'bus.

As I walked home from the 'bus stop, minding the ice on the pavement, I thought about Kate and how the evening had gone. We certainly got on well; she is most pleasant company. A more successful evening by far than my only previous date with somebody met online (Jane, about whom I 'blog below). I worry, however, that there is a certain lack of flirtatious frisson, an absence, to some extent even, of attraction. Kate is by no means unattractive (rather more good-looking, certainly, than Jane), and we get on well as people; I wonder whether, as I have long suspected, male attraction to women is driven to a greater extent than many realise by subtle expressions of interest by the woman (i.e., flirtation), which effect is largely subconscious, and that the absence of such signals, even for somebody who would not consciously notice them or even realise that the person was interested, can make a world of difference to attraction. I want to see her again because I enjoyed her company; but is the lack of a certain passion, a certain frisky je ne sais quoi, an elephant in the room; or might it come in time?

I contemplated this as I walked up the hill in the powdery snow and chill wind. She had certainly seemed to enjoy my company, and, indeed, to be keen to see me again (witness the repeated references to the cake); is Kate, perhaps, one of those people who does not by nature display those signals of interest? Is that, perhaps, why somebody who is clearly a lovely person (and the sort of level-headed, easy-going person, as far as I can tell, who would otherwise tend to be considered highly desirable by men looking for long-term relationships), and who is not in the least unattractive, is, at the age of twenty-nine, still unattached and using Internet dating services? Or was she, despite seeming to enjoy my company and being keen to see me again, actually not attracted to me?

I resolved not to give up on Kate. I like her - even if there is no romantic connexion, she is the sort of person that I'd want to have as a friend (which is a prerequisite for romantic interest in any event). I have often found that attraction can grow with time, when I get to know a person better; when she gets to know me better. There were moments when I did feel attraction (I liked the slightly frisky "will you wear a hat for me?" PS in the pre-date message, for example), and I wonder whether there was some element of it being rather hard to concentrate on anything else than having a good conversation and a pleasant night. After all, meeting over the internet is different - one does not start with direct contact. The date comes at an earlier stage. There is still room for things to grow - perhaps. I shall ask her out again - to-morrow. I shall suggest that we go to the "Turner and the Masters" exhibition at Tate Britain, which finishes at the end of the month, and in which we had both expressed an interest on our long walk from the restaurant to her 'bus.

In the meantime, I shall be intrigued to discover what she is going to bake for me: I do love a bit of home made cake.

07 January, 2010

There's no business like snow business

...Coatman gets a date in the Arctic winter

Narnia in Southwark

WE SET a date for Friday: I'm taking her to the theatre, to see what looks to be a most entertaining show on its very first preview night. Time Out recommends it. I haven't told her what we're seeing - just to meet met at a certain station at a certain time, and that we'll go from there.

The chill winds of the Arctic winter continue to blow; even in inner London, there is a hefty covering of snow. My Facebook live feed is filled with pictures of snowmen and people proclaiming that they are staying in bed and reading a book instead of going to work, or that they're worried that they won't be able to go on holiday, or disappointed not to be able to have dinner with their friends. Yesterday, I went and took some photographs, including the one above, in a local park. My parents were supposed to visit, but they've been detained by the even thicker snow where they live. Roads are passable here, but there is disruption on the trains, I'm told. There is something rather reassuring about the fact that my date for Friday is going to work in spite of the snow, intrepidly posting a photograph of the "business as usual" sign in the snow on her employer's website.

All the advice that I've read about online dating suggests to talk on the telephone before meeting in person, to proceed gingerly, to reverse the normal order of things and give her my number first; but I find that there's something inherently awkward about having a telephone conversation in those circumstances; there's no pretext, and one struggles to parse the somewhat limited information that poor quality audio gives one. If one is after a good first impression, a telephone call is a bad place to give one. Meeting in person is more lively and energetic; one can see a person's body language and facial gestures, and hear them more clearly than over a telephone line; there's a pretext, something to do, so there's no awkwardness of trying to find something to say just for the sake of it. I'm not good without context, and there's only so long that one can talk about the weather, even with weather as interesting as it has been of late.

With Kate, I had followed all the suggestions; I had given her my number and suggested that she call if she be so inclined, and she had seemed happy to do so; but I was delighted when she wrote,

"Are you sure you want to have a chat on the phone.. you don't fancy a trip to the theatre or similar on Friday instead?"

I replied,

"A trip to the theatre on Friday is a splendid idea, actually (weather permitting!). Did you have something specific in mind, or shall I surprise you?"

She wrote,

"I'm so glad you are up for the theatre - it will be nice to meet and also to enjoy a little culture. Especially as it seems that alot of my activities this week will be cancelled due to snow (pathetic - there is about an inch and a half here). I love surprises so I'm happy for you to choose."

So, the date is set. I live almost in walking distance of the theatre (perhaps two or three miles away), and Kate is a short train ride away. Unless there is another heavy snowfall, we should make it. Now, just to find somewhere good to eat afterwards: a browse of Top Table is in order, I think.

Incidentally, I have also had a (very belated) reply from Amber; shall reply later this afternoon, and keep people posted apropos her and Kate as things progress. Wish me luck (or give me tips, or both...)!

03 January, 2010

Re-casting the net

...honing the profile

THERE not being much to report in terms of in-person meetings since my last 'blog post, still staying with the parents in deepest suburbia (returning to the flat to-morrow), I shall briefly recount the latest developments in the world of online dating, before shamelessly using my 'blog to get advice about the latest revision to my various profiles.

Last time, I mentioned that I had been communicating with somebody on Match.com (I shall call her Kate); she sent me a message on new year's day indicating an intention to call me by telephone (I had given her the number a little while ago), so that might well, to borrow terminology from technical support, be escalated in the near future. Shall keep readers up to date.

Also, taking the advice of the rather wonderful Dithering Heights, I thought that I'd try OKCupid again, and have had some surprisingly successful results; I e-mailed three or four people, one of whom responded (probably not much of a prospect, since she is only here temporarily to study, being originally from the US, but seems pleasant enough; I shall call her Karen). I spent some time looking at one person's profile (whom I shall call Amber), thinking that she seemed interesting, but in the end decided that I was too tired to compose a witty message (and suspected that she would probably want children in any event), and did not send the message; to my surprise, the next morning, I awoke to find that she had sent me a message. I was quite impressed with her wit (and she seemed rather impressed with the fact that I had recently performed a stand-up routine); I responded to-day, and shall again keep readers posted of any further developments.

Flushed with an unusual bout of success, I decided that it was high time to up-wit my profiles on various dating sites. As trailed in the introductory paragraph, here is where I trawl for free proofreading. Here is my new profile from PlentyOfFish:

"In no particular order: I love style and hate fashion, adore cats and am somewhat suspicious of big dogs, ride a bicycle in place both of driving a car and going to a gymnasium, believe in the importance of reason and logic, and am useless at mental arithmetic.

I once appeared as an extra on Trigger Happy TV dressed as a panda, recently performed a stand-up routine to get into a party for free, have entered the Turnip Prize, can spot a misplaced apostrophe at fifty paces, bake (and ice) my own cakes, love old-fashioned style but also modern technology, believe in substance over form (but that form comes a close second), prefer to dress up than to dress down, and believe that genuine originality is better than unoriginality, but that genuine conventionality is better than faux originality. I believe in consistency, openness, politeness, reasonableness and honesty, and that dinner is not complete without a pudding. I am also fond of brimmed hats and walking length umbrellas, but own neither since they are both singularly incompatible with safe bicycle travel. Tailor made three-piece suits with pocket handkerchiefs are a good second best, though.

I prefer the subtly quirky to the popularly eccentric, and know the difference between an elephant and a postbox, but that doesn't mean that you should send me to post a letter, or that I also know the difference between an elephant and an aspirin.

I get to wear fancy dress and argue for a living, which is always a plus, although I do get sent occasionally to far-flung corners of England and Wales to do it, which is good when I finish at half-past ten in the morning and get to spend the afternoon in a museum, or if I get sent to some coastal resort and send a postcard to my colleagues back in London and bring them some rock, but not so good if it involves getting up at silly o'clock in the morning or staying overnight in a less than salubrious location in which the local mission's motto is "a bright light in a dark place" (alas, I am not making this up, as anyone who has ever visited Preston might know).

I have recently moved into a flat on my own in South-East London, much closer to work than I was before, which involves more time for baking, and becoming intimately acquainted with Southwark's rather detailed rules about what can and cannot be recycled. I am rather looking forward to holding a mad hatters' tea party at my flat, too.

I am also about to take up ballroom dancing lessons, the practical utility of which may be somewhat limited (I have not yet had occasion to attend a tea dance; perhaps I shall have to befriend lots of people who are about to get married and get invited to their weddings), but which should, I hope, be fun.

As to my tastes in books, films, music and food, here is a somewhat random cross-section:

Books

Watching the English, The Hitchikers' Guide to the Galaxy, Eats, Shoots and Leaves, Aberystwith mon Amour, The Selfish Gene, and others that I've probably now forgotten.

Films

Brief Encounter, The Producers, Wallace & Gromit/Chicken Run, A Room with a View (which, incidentally, is nothing like Eddie Izzard's description of it - there's nobody called Sebastian, for a start), The Planet of the Apes, most things involving Alfred Hitchcock and Austin Powers (the original more than the sequels).

Music

Most things orchestral/symphonic (what many call "classical", although, strictly, baroque, romantic and modern things, too), and, a slightly eclectic mix of more modern music, the only underlying theme of which is probably "catchy tunes".

Food

Yoghurt, panini, wholemeal toast, cheese, lasagne, fruit crumbles, Christmas pudding, Quorn and, of course, cake.

***

I like arguing (in the strict sense of forming coherent and logical arguments for things, rather than the colloquial sense of bickering; fans of Monty Python, at least, should appreciate the difference), making cunning plans, walking long distances, befriending strange cats, going on holiday, taking photographs, causing people amusement, being caused amusement by others, and professing to know the difference between large African heard animals and street furniture. If you, too, know the difference (or at least, claim to know the difference), cringe at bad punctuation and/or know any good cake recipes, then we should talk."

Meanwhile, here is my section of the profile on My Single Friend (my friend Mike's section of the profile, which I reproduced in a previous post has not changed), in which there is a fairly strict character limit, requiring a more concise profile:

"[Mike] flatters me! To expand somewhat: I do indeed get to wear fancy dress and argue for a living, which can be fun, although I do get sent occasionally to far-flung corners of the land to do it, which is good when I finish at half-past ten in the morning and get to spend the afternoon in a museum, or if I get sent to some coastal resort and send a postcard to my colleagues back in London and bring them some rock, but not so good if it involves getting up at silly o'clock in the morning or staying overnight in a less than salubrious location in which the local mission's motto is "a bright light in a dark place" (I am not making this up, alas).

I have recently moved into a flat on my own in South-East London, much closer to work than I was before, which involves more time for baking. I am rather looking forward to holding a mad hatters' tea party at my flat. I am also about to take up ballroom dancing lessons, the practical utility of which may be rather limited (perhaps I shall have to befriend lots of people who are about to get married and get invited to their weddings), but which should be fun.

As for my politics: I am indeed Conservative, although firmly at the liberal end of that spectrum - and I have plenty of interests other than politics, too!

I prefer the subtly quirky to the popularly eccentric, and know the difference between an elephant and a postbox, but that doesn't mean that you should send me to post a letter. I like arguing (in the strict sense of forming coherent and logical arguments for things, rather than the colloquial sense of bickering), making cunning plans, walking long distances, befriending strange cats, going on holiday, taking photographs, causing people amusement, being caused amusement, and professing to know the difference between large African heard animals and street furniture. If you, too, know the difference, cringe at bad punctuation and/or know any good cake recipes, then we should talk."

Is that an improvement, do people think? Answers on the 21st century equivalent of a postcard, please!

28 December, 2009

Festive frolics

...fun, flirtation and frustration in the season of goodwill

Image

CHRISTMAS, apart from being the season of goodwill and excessive shopping, is a good time to go to parties. Parties, in turn, are good for meeting interesting people: both good new friends (always worthwhile), and prospects. Having recently moved out of the far distant suburbs and into proper inner London (as my 020 7 dialling code tells me), attending said parties is rather easier than it has been in years past.

Party no. 1 was our work Christmas party. Not a particularly effective venue for meeting prospects, although my Christmas cake went down rather well with my colleagues and our professional clients, which is always a good start. Whether our clients liking my cake will lead to me getting more work is debatable, but there is something infinitely satisfying about people enjoying the products of my baking efforts that makes it all worthwhile in any event. Did make a new friend, however: Bea, a friend of Lara's, who after a fairly brief conversation about our mutual interest in baking, promptly volunteered to organise all the tea for my planned mad hatters' tea party next year. That, I think, is the sort of friend worth having.

Afterwards, Senior Colleague took a somewhat eclectic collection of us, comprising me, Very Senior Colleague, Bea and Lara to some upmarket club in the West End, where we stayed until some ludicrous hour of the morning necessitating a taxi ride home (when the pleasures of living in zone 2 are greatly magnified). For reasons that I now forget, Senior Colleague, who was by now a little squiffy, got to talking about Sandra, with whom she has become friendly, and mentioned somewhat pointedly that she had recently broken up with her long-term boyfriend, before proceeding to give her a glowing review (at least, I think that she meant "very pure" as a compliment to her). She also said something like that I'd make a perfect husband, which was rather sweet, although I rather wish that she'd mention that to some interesting eligible bachelorettes. (I wonder whether she already has mentioned this to Sandra, the usefulness of which would, alas, be infinitely diminished by the fact that Sandra, although otherwise lovely, smokes like a chimney - a dealbreaker for me).

Party no. 2 was our work's internal Christmas dinner, the following Monday. Zero chance of meeting anyone new (prospect or otherwise), but a very pleasant dinner in a rather lovely West End club, all paid for by Senior Colleague, which was delightful. Did, however, learn the rather interesting tidbit to which reference is made in the post below about another colleague having met her partner through Match.com. Senior Colleague repeated the line about a "perfect husband" (subsequently modifying it to "ideal husband" to match the title of the Oscar Wilde play); Lara chipped in that I'd be "infuriating", which, after trying to consider what she might have meant, I concluded that she was probably right.

Party no. 3 was not so much of a conventional party, but was organised by the party of the political kind to which I belong, and did involve socialising, so it more or less counts. It was a talk given by a retired senior politician with a drinks reception before and afterwards. I made an effort to mingle, and spoke to a number of people, including some attractive young ladies, but nobody seemed particularly interested until, right at the very end, just as I was about to leave, one young lady (who seemed to be a smidgen in drink) approached me, said that the question that I had asked to the speaker (about the wisdom - or otherwise - of pegging interest rates to the CPI, if I recall correctly) was a good one, and said that she hoped that she'd see me at some future event. Didn't talk to her long enough to know whether I was interested in her, but a sliver of a prospect, perhaps.

Party no. 4 was my previous work's Christmas party, to which I am customarily invited because they're all very nice people. This fell on the same night as party no. 5 (of which more below), so I didn't get to stay long; no meeting of new people, but lovely catching up with old friends, which is always worthwhile.

Party no. 5 was Giles' Christmas house party; or rather, Giles' slightly eccentric housemate's Christmas house party. The wonderful thing about Giles' slightly eccentric housemate is that he has a wonderful collection of slightly eccentric friends. Two are of interest for present purposes. One was Kirsty, a lawyer of the same age as me, who is delightfully old-fashioned and seems to have as much of a passion for baking as I do, as well as a joy in all things antiquated. We spent some time talking and seemed to get on quite well, although she didn't give any particularly strong signs of interest. Nevertheless, at one point, I had posed a riddle to the group in which we were both talking ("which Underground station name is wholly contained inside which other Underground station name?"), and, as she had been in the kitchen when I had given the answer to the others, was still unaware of it by the time that I was to go home (earlier than others, as I had to work over the week-end: the joys of urgent paperwork). I asked her whether she wanted to know the answer; she said that she still wanted to guess it (knowing that I was about to leave). I don't know whether I was entirely off-base in detecting some preference to talk to me again in that exchange. I cannot now recall whether it was before or after that that I mentioned to her my mad hatters' tea party, and she seemed enthusiastic to come. I gave her my pocket notepad to record her details - she started to write her number, but crossed it out after three or four digits, and wrote her name and work e-mail instead. Not a good sign, I suspect. Nonetheless, she had wanted to come to the party, so I added her on Facebook, and she confirmed me. Shortly afterwards, I sent her this message:

" [Kirsty],

lovely to have met you on Friday - it's always delightful to meet people of a similar level of sanity to oneself, especially if they bake cakes.

Have you yet come up with an answer to the riddle (which, in case you have forgotten, is "which Underground station name is wholly contained inside which other Underground station name")?

Let's make it a little more interesting - if you come up with the right answer (specifying both station names) in a single guess before Christmas this year, I will bake you a batch of my famous apple flapjacks. Conversely, if you don't guess in time, at all, or guess wrong, you bake me the most fabulous cake that you know how to make. Are you game?

[Coatman]."

A week or two later, she replied thus:

"Hi [CoatMan] - Yes lovely to meet you too! Sorry, Christmas being what it is I don't think I'll manage any cake/riddle meetings, but hope you are feeling festive and have a lovely holiday.

[Kirsty]"

Not interested, I think, but might make an amusing guest at the tea party.

The second person of interest at party no. 5, Maria, was somewhat more of an enigma - she arrived, already a little tipsy, shortly before midnight, and shortly before I was about to leave. I think that I noticed her (and briefly noted that she appeared to be pretty) when she arrived. After I had already called the taxi to go home (a blissfully short ride from the party, given my new abode), she asked me to dance with her (actually, rather more challenged than asked); I protested that I really had no idea how to dance, but she insisted, so we took each other's hands and I attempted to move in some sort of time with the music as she twirled and bopped and generally danced as competently as a drunk person who knows how to dance does. She said that I was "lovely" several times, and seemed to be delighted that I agreed to "dance" with her (the quote marks are well advised). She also commented that I was very polite, which she seemed to like (why on earth the ordinary social courtesy of politeness should be elevated to a compliment escapes me, but she clearly intended it as such). At some point during our dancing attempt, I asked her whether she liked cake, to which she responded enthusiastically in the affirmative. I then mentioned the party, and before long, she was giving me her number (no work e-mail this time). I suggested that she add her e-mail, too, so that I could find her on Facebook to send her the party invite, which she did, apologising for her (perfectly legible) handwriting, pointing out that she was a little tipsy by now. When I later inspected the note, I had found that she had written her first name, her mobile telephone number, her personal e-mail address and "mad hatters".

The party was on a Friday. At about seven o'clock on Monday evening, I called from my home telephone (I had not given her any number of mine, so she would not have known who was calling). The telephone rang for some time and then went to voicemail. I didn't leave a message, resolving to call her again in half an hour or so, it being better to speak in person. Half an hour passed, and I called again. Voicemail. I left a message, something like,

"Hello - this is [Coatman], the mad hatter from Giles' party; just calling to see whether you'd like to go for a drink next Monday. If you'd like that, do give me a call back: my number is [my number, twice for clarity]."

The following Monday was the only day that I had free that week, other than the next day, the Tuesday, which I thought a little short notice (the plan had been to suggest the Tuesday if she was unavailable on the Monday). I have never heard back. I tried to find her on Facebook using the e-mail address that she had given, but she did not appear. Maria will remain, I suspect, forever an enigma, the only explanation forthcoming in my mind being that, when sober, she had thought to herself "Oh my giddy aunt - who on earth did I flirt with at that party? I really hope that he's lost my number" (or words to that effect).

Party no. 6 was a sort of after-party affair at the performance of a regular amateur dramatic revue (for which, this year, I had written some contributions). Nothing particularly of note, save that the performers all seemed to have enjoyed my material (which seemed to get a good laugh from the audience, too). Also, acquired a new friend (at least, according to Facebook): somebody who had sung a rather impressive song that she had written herself at a previous party about which I have 'blogged briefly before (I think) and had also performed at the revue.

Party no. 7 was the annual Christmas event at my local model engineering club, which is always delightful, but, given the demographic that one would expect at a model engineering club (and this one duly fulfils all expectations), not the place for meeting eligible members of the opposite sex. I did, however, manage to get rid of one of the bottles of wine that had lain unused and taking up space in the kitchen since my flat-warming party in November by donating it to the raffle.

Party no. 8 was a rather more sedate affair, held in the afternoon and evening of Sunday last. It was Bea's birthday party (held in Lara's rather extensive - and, for me, conveniently located, shared house), and, in gratitude for her generous offer to organise the tea for my tea party, I baked a lemon sponge cake and brought it along. A pleasant evening (and, most satisfyingly, all but a slice of my cake had been consumed by the end, despite the number of guests being modest - Bea herself had three slices), although not as promising on the prospects front as Giles', partly owing to the relative fewness of the attendees. Most of the women there were already taken, and the only one who was certainly single did not appeal. Somewhat dysfunctionally, I gathered the increasingly distinct impression that Bea was being somewhat flirtatious towards me (dysfunctionally in that she has a boyfriend with whom she has been in a relationship for eight years - who was at the party: nice chap, although a smoker), an impression which I had vaguely had at party no. 2 but had dismissed for that reason. The frequent touching of my arm in conversation and the tactile enthusiasm with which she appreciated the co-ordination of my tie, pocket handkerchief and suit lining were what gave the impression. Whilst, therefore, not a prospect, it is always gratifying (and, helpfully, good for the confidence) to be flirted at by somebody decidedly attractive. Overall, and especially in light of the fact that no fewer than three people asked for the recipe of the lemon sponge, a successful evening.

Christmas itself, I have spent with my parents (and my grandmother from Wales, who makes the most excellent Christmas puddings, and who gave me for Christmas her old cast iron bakestone (which is now too heavy for her to use) and taught me to make Welsh cakes), parties and prospects being temporarily replaced by roast dinners, games of Monopoly and visits from long-standing family friends.

When I return to the capital in the new year, I shall be taking up a new activity on Tuesday evenings: ballroom dancing. Having realised that an ability to dance is a rather popular attribute (especially in view of the rather brief escapade with Maria at no. 5), and that a ballroom dancing class might be an effective way to meet new people, and having found a regular class suited to complete beginners within walking distance of where I live, I have signed up for the promisingly relaxed looking lessons that begin in the second week of January and, most helpfully, allow attendees to progress to the next level at their own pace, which, in view of my dancing abilities being roughly equivalent to those of a newly born giraffe with severe dyspraxia, is a great relief.

Finally, I ought note that I have been communicating with a young lady on Match.com for several weeks now; unusually, she contacted me first. I must confess to being a smidgen ambivalent about this one so far (she often leaves long gaps between messages - although, to be fair, with this individual, so do I, and she seems, at least in the medium of e-mail, to lack that certain witty flair that I find so enchanting), although she seems nice enough (and pretty enough), she likes cats, and, as a certain regular commenter on this 'blog would point out, even if nothing comes of it, it is all good experience. I shall keep people posted.

In the meantime, wishing everyone a retrospective merry Christmas, and a prospective happy, prosperous and extremely successful (in dating and everything else) new year!

07 December, 2009

Online dating doldrums

...am I doing something wrong?

ONLINE dating, I am told, is a numbers game. It has drawbacks, certainly, and I have no intention of relying on it as the only possible method of meeting someone, but there is every reason to try it alongside more traditional methods. Everyone at work went out this evening to a rather lovely dinner arranged by Senior Colleague at a London club, and, talking to a colleague whom I have known for over 18 months, it transpires that she met her long-term partner (whom I have met - terribly nice chap) on Match.com - reason, if any, to continue to pursue that as an option.

I am beginning to wonder, however, whether my numbers are unusually pessimistic, and, if so, why. As documented in the previous post, I recently joined My Single Friend, which has particularly good record keeping functions, where I can easily record how many people have favourited me, how many people that I have e-mailed, how many have read my messages, and how many of those have responded.

In the last week, I have sent a total of twelve messages, of which seven have been read (the last one having been sent on the evening of the 2nd of December). I have had no replies. One person has added me to her favourites, but she was unsuitable, as she professed religious belief.

Mike (whom I am meeting for a drink to-morrow evening) seems to have had rather more luck than me, having told me that a rather large number of people had added him to their favourites on the first day that he appeared on the site. I initially wondered whether that imbalance was due to the fact that I might not appear in many people's searches because I had selected the "does not want to have children" option, but that cannot explain the lack of success in relation to the messages that I have sent, since, on MySingleFriend, whether a person wants children, although a searchable criterion, is not something that is displayed in a person's profile, so it cannot be seen by a person to whom a message is sent.

I reproduce below what Mike wrote about me on MySingleFriend, and what I added. Am I doing something wrong? Is there something askew with what Mike wrote?

Since leaving school, [Coatman] has become one of my closest and personal friends. He is one of the most loyal, charming and intelligent (really!) gentlemen I know.

By day he can be found in his chambers, wearing his gown and wig and ferociously representing his clients on all manner of legal cases. Despite his modesty I get the impression he's very very good at this!

At weekends he's a traveller and is happiest when he's off exploring a provincial part of the UK (or even further a field!). He's also an absolute legend at baking and women have been known to offer their first born just for a slice of his lemon drizzle cake!

Some things James won't necessarily tell you on meeting him (but hey that's what friends are for):

- He's rarely not found wearing a suit
- He's conservative - with both a small c and a big C.
- He would tell you he doesn't suffer fools gladly but enjoys making them squirm!
- His biggest inspiration in life is his truly wonderful grandmother!
- He's secretly building a steam powered computer ready to take over the world!
- He likes Cats and Hats!

Only contact [Coatman] if you have a good heart, strong moral fibre and a passion for cake!

And I wrote:

[Mike] flatters me! I have not, I must confess, yet attempted a lemon drizzle cake (although I might have a go now that it's been mentioned), but my own recipe apple flapjacks seem to go down rather well. My annual Christmas cakes are also surprisingly popular at work.

More generally: I love style and hate fashion, adore cats and am a little suspicious of dogs, ride a bicycle in place both of driving a car and going to a gymnasium, believe in the importance of reason and logic, and am useless at mental arithmetic.

I once appeared as an extra on Trigger Happy TV, recently performed a stand-up routine to get into a party for free, have entered the Turnip Prize, can spot a misplaced apostrophe at fifty paces, love old-fashioned style but modern technology, believe in substance over form (but that form comes a close second), prefer to dress up than to dress down, and believe that genuine originality is better than unoriginality, but that genuine conventionality is better than faux originality. I am also fond of brimmed hats and walking length umbrellas, but own neither since they are both singularly incompatible with safe bicycle travel.

I do love exploring the interesting and sometimes quirky side of London - everything from museums (both mainstream and obscure) to delightful restaurants old and new. I also love a bit of comedy and wit (anything from Oscar Wilde to Eddie Izzard); I do enjoy making people laugh (and being made to laugh), but have been told that my sense of humour is somewhat on the dry side.

As to being C(c)onservative leaning, that is true, although firmly on the liberal end of that spectrum.

As to what I look for, I like intelligence, confidence, nous and tenacity, wit and hats. (Hats are not compulsory, but I can't resist a woman in a hat. Or rather, I can, but it's somewhat of a challenge). Someone who's up for a fun challenge and doesn't mind being surprised in pleasant ways would also be good.

Oddly, I seem to do better face to face than on internet dating sites: I often find that people (usually unsuitable, sometimes even already seeing other people) appear to express an interest and be flirtatious when I meet them in person, but I have had very little success indeed at eliciting any responses on online dating sites. Is my profile off? Or are my e-mails not good? Here is an example of one that I sent on MySingleFriend, which was read, but to which I received no reply (she had professed in her profile to liking "adventures"):

Adventures

I do like a good adventure; why, only the other week, I made it all the way to John Lewis and back, and emerged mostly unscathed, carrying a bedside lamp and a couple of florets of broccoli. There was also the whole cycling in the pouring rain thing last Sunday, which was a surprisingly damp experience, even with waterproof clothing.

Your adventures seem to involve wearing a Union flag, which, considering that it's a flag, is surprisingly fetching as a garment. Was that a sporting event, or were you attending a fancy dress party attired as Britannia?

[Coatman]

And here is another in a slightly different style (she had written that she drank tea all day long and had a very eclectic mix of music on her iPod):

Do you also like biscuits? Couldn't resist sending a message to a self-confessed tea addict: infinitely better than anything fizzy and/or from a can, I think. My next house party is going to be a mad hatters' and March hares' tea party, complete with real teapot and vintage cake crockery, and, of course, fancy dress. I'll be a mad hatter, because I'm mad and I like hats.

What's the most eclectic thing on your iPod?

[Coatman].

Are those cunningly witty, or just bizarre and irritating? Is the problem more my profile? Or are readers as perplexed as I am? As ever, tips for the clueless would be much appreciated.

01 December, 2009

A fresh start

...a new home, new opportunities, and a new challenge

I COLLECTED the keys on the 5th. By the 14th, I was having my flat-warming party (Bluesoup, where were you?), complete with guess the weight of the cake competition and "everyone who" photographs (cat lovers outnumbered dog lovers 2:1, I am pleased to report). My coffee table is now replete with "new home" cards, and I had some lovely presents from lovely people: D and R gave me a pot plant (which I have been keeping alive) and a box of chocolates; a colleague bought me a set of wine glasses; Carol bought me a cat themed apron; and Senior Colleague bought me a kitchen radio. On buying plant food for the aforementioned pot plant last week-end, I found that the local garden centre has a resident cat who allows all and sundry to fondle him, which made me very happy indeed.

I ran into the lady who won the guess the weight of the cake competition last night at an event, and was told that she had dispatched the cake to the nursing home where her mother had spent her final days, and that the elderly residents were delighted: one even cried with pleasure (at least, I was told that it was with pleasure that she cried on eating my cake). I now live five and a half miles from work, in a lovely (but not too expensive) part of South-East London in a rather nice little flat. I have a retro dial telephone and lots of second-hand furniture. One pressing question remains: what to call this 'blog? "Celibacy and the inner Suburbs"?

* * * * *

I DID go on a date with Jane in the end: after a few more messages were exchanged, we agreed to meet in Covent Garden. Yet to finalise our destination, I asked Very Senior Colleague and a mutual friend at a conference the week-end before whether they knew of any good places to go, and they recommended Chez Gerard, which has a panoramic view of the square. In an e-mail to her arranging the time, I made a quip about not needing to hold a copy of The Times, stand under a clock or wear a red carnation in the days of mobile telephone communications (we had swapped numbers by this point), and she retorted that she would be disappointed not to see a carnation. Not to miss an opportunity, I bought a bunch of carnations (and a vase to put them in, which I now keep atop my dining table, topped up with fresh flowers), cut off one head, and, just before I was due to meet Jane, affixed it to my pocket. I also bought a copy of The Times, and stood in the location where we had arranged to meet, reading it.

The ploy seemed to work, as, standing at the appointed location, five or ten minutes after the appointed time, Jane approached and evidently realised who I was. That, alas, was the pinnacle of the evening. Whether through nervousness, a general lack of socialisation or some combination of both, nearly all of the conversation that evening was initiated and maintained by me (despite there being ample opportunities for her to pick her own topics). She came accross rather as a rabbit caught in headlights, and, although evidently intelligent (and, to be fair to her, a perfectly pleasant lady, as far as I could tell from our somewhat limited conversation, which was mainly about her PhD and related topics), lacked all trace of wit and charisma. The conversation was not unpleasant: despite feeling like I had been assigned the job of teaching her how to make casual conversation, at a rather novice level, interesting things were discussed, and there were no awkward misunderstandings. Certainly, it is possible to imagine something far worse.

At the end of the evening, I handed her the carnation, shook hands, and managed to find a formulation of words that were both polite and that did not give the false impression that I should be interested in seeing her again. Later that evening, she sent a text message saying that she had had a pleasant time and that she hoped that I was not perturbed by her "inane ramblings". Thinking to myself that it was rather the absence of ramblings, inane or otherwise, that the problem was, I simply replied,

"It was lovely to have met you."

That was the end of it.

* * * * *

I HAD arranged some weeks ago to go out with two old school friends of an evening, but one of them, Mike, was unable to attend at the last minute. The next evening, he called me, and we talked at length (discovering that we now lived very close to each other). Last time that I had met him, he had just broken up with his girlfriend of a number of years because, he said, although things were stable and happy enough, he could not really see himself with that particular young lady in the long-term. We got to discussing our respective romantic positions, and he came up with a challenge: if, by a date in March of next year, I had not found what I wanted in the field of romance (not necessarily a long-term partner - whatever it was that I was after, he said), or come up with a more up-to-date excuse than that it was difficult finding anyone when living with my parents, I was to bake him some apple flapjacks. Conversely, if I did find whatever I was after, he was to bake me a walnut cake. I accepted.

He suggested that we recommend each other on My Single Friend, a rather different sort of dating site, in which the principal descriptions are given by friends of those looking for romance, rather than the people themselves. I have heard in the past good things about the service, and how, because of the format, rather more women than men tend to be signed up, and so agreed heartily with his suggestion.

Our profiles went live yesterday. With My Single Friend, one gets an e-mail notification of whenever people add one as a favourite. Yesterday, I had one such notification from a young lady who, unfortunately, was unsuitable owing to professing to being religious. Yesterday evening, Mike called. He said that he had just been on a date with a young lady with whom he had been set up by a friend, but had found her to be entirely unsuitable (her having revealed at one point that she had been made bankrupt after having over £30,000 worth of debt; I remarked that that was a larger red flag than one might find on Brighton beach in a storm, and that the irony of an accountant marrying a bankrupt would not be the good sort of irony - he agreed). He did, however, say that I must have made a rather excellent job of writing his description, because he had had a very large number indeed of people adding him as a favourite, his inbox being filled with mail from My Single Friend. I wonder whether the difference in our relative levels of success might be attributed to the fact that I specified the "definitely does not want to have children" option, whereas he, I think, stipulated something a little more neutral. I sent four messages myself, but have yet received no reply (two of them having been read this morning, one this afternoon, and one remaining unread).

I also suggested that we try speed dating sometime, to which he agreed heartily. Owing to the fullness of my calendar, it is likely to have to be next year, but that gives some time to plan when we meet for a drink next week. More on that soon.

* * * * *

So far, living in London seems to be going well - any tips from readers regular or irregular on good ways of meeting local people for friendship and romance? I have already applied to join the local branch of a political party with which I have some peripheral involvement, and am considering whether to try to learn ballroom dancing (and if there are any classes nearby likely to have people under the age of fifty-five attending them). Any other ideas would be most welcome.